United States v. Jones
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10–1259.pdf
SCOTUS ruled today that placing a GPS tracking device on a defendant’s vehicle is a search within the meaning of the 4th Amendment.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10–1259.pdf
SCOTUS ruled today that placing a GPS tracking device on a defendant’s vehicle is a search within the meaning of the 4th Amendment.
I must have given my supervising attorneys at the PD’s office the warm fuzzies that one time I was in front of the judge since they’re having me split the docket starting the end of this month. Either warm fuzzies or they’re that short district court attorneys. [Hint: It’s the latter.]
Read more »
Working at the Office of the Public Defender is incredible.
I’m learning so much about the practice of criminal law, it’s actually pretty pathetic. I mean, you’d like to imagine that after law school and the bar you know something about the reality of criminal law.
Something.
Anything at all.
I remember when he was arrested.
An orthodox man who brokered deals between people who needed organ transplants but had years to wait on the official list and people who were willing to donate the needed organs.
Now Levy Izhak Rosenbaum has pled guilty to organ trafficking.
Troy Davis was executed last night.
I can’t explain the details surrounding his case better than Jeff Gamso has; I can’t argue with Mark Osler’s article on cnn.com explaining why we should err on the side of not murdering someone. It almost seems like there is nothing left to say… but I can’t sit now and say nothing.
Yesterday I interned at the Office of the Public Defender in district court. This was the first day of my new schedule, working my 40 hours in 4 days and taking Tuesdays off to intern at the OPD. It was frigging fantastic.
Since I’m still waiting on my bar results the most I can do is act as a law clerk, but that’s still much more than I’ve had the chance to do before now.
The more I find out about the court and its procedures (not civil, not criminal, but administrative) the more ignorant I feel. But at least it’s tempered with the knowledge that I’m in the right place to learn.
Turns out that the district court I’m working at splits up the courtrooms by district. I was assigned to one courtroom and I shadow the attorneys who work that room.
Utter chaos started the day; people all over the place, lawyers snatching conversations with clients and their families beforehand and running out of the courtroom for minutes at a time to follow up with clients afterward.
Between the two attorneys I shadowed, there were about 20 cases during the morning docket, but only 5 or so during the afternoon.
When the afternoon docket was finished, one of the attorneys asked me if I found it boring or exciting. I told him that I’m still at the point where it’s all exciting, no matter how boring it is.
http://www.mdcourts.gov/opinions/cosa/2011/1992s09.pdf
This opinion by the Court of Special Appeals addresses several issues. The one I want to highlight is the second question presented to the court.
2. Did the trial court err in admitting extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement made by the Appellant when the Appellant admitted having made the statement and explained why he had made it?
This was supposed to have been easier.
When I first starting working, years before I started law school, I ran into the same problem everyone runs into when trying to find an entry-level position anywhere — how do you get work experience without already having work experience?
I was fortunate enough to get an interview with SSA back when they were still hiring anyone with a pulse. Now, nearly seven years later when I’m looking for a job in the legal profession, I was hoping that having seven years of work experience would count for something.
I will now allow you to wipe up whatever it was you were drinking that you spewed all over your keyboard after reading that.