<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Point &amp; Glick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pointandglick.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pointandglick.com</link>
	<description>Staggering blindly into the legal world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So much to learn — Updated by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/748/so-much-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=748#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Everyone lies.  You forgot who tells the most and biggest lies--defense attorneys.  Tell me the name of a defense attorney who does not lie in a court room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone lies.  You forgot who tells the most and biggest lies–defense attorneys.  Tell me the name of a defense attorney who does not lie in a court room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I believe… by Law blog roundup - On the Record</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/769/i-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Law blog roundup - On the Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=769#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>[...] Believe in what you do. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Believe in what you do. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Done, and done! by mglickman</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/741/done-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>mglickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=741#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>While this came up as spam and I have no way of knowing whether it&#039;s real or not, I wholeheartedly approve of this comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this came up as spam and I have no way of knowing whether it’s real or not, I wholeheartedly approve of this comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Done, and done! by Jetsin</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/741/done-and-done/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=741#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>If I were a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle, now I&#039;d say Koawbunga, dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle, now I’d say Koawbunga, dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Job search 101: Experience or Money? by mglickman</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/685/job-search-101-experience-or-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>mglickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=685#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Thanks! 
I probably should have mentioned that I know that I&#039;m more fortunate than many other law grads because I already have a job. 
Sure, I&#039;d love to work as a lawyer, but it beats not working at all by a long shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!<br />
I probably should have mentioned that I know that I’m more fortunate than many other law grads because I already have a job.<br />
Sure, I’d love to work as a lawyer, but it beats not working at all by a long shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Job search 101: Experience or Money? by Pauline</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/685/job-search-101-experience-or-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=685#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>I feel your pain. =( Hopefully, things work out eventually for you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain. =( Hopefully, things work out eventually for you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics, Ethics, Everywhere… by Law blog roundup - On the Record</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/679/ethics-ethics-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Law blog roundup - On the Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=679#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] Keeping young associates in line, ethically speaking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Keeping young associates in line, ethically speaking. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics, Ethics, Everywhere… by mglickman</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/679/ethics-ethics-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>mglickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=679#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>I hate those darn typos. Obviously &quot;sanctioned,&quot; not &quot;sancitoned.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate those darn typos. Obviously “sanctioned,” not “sancitoned.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics, Ethics, Everywhere… by mglickman</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/679/ethics-ethics-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>mglickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=679#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll start with your point about the tone of the posts: Yes, they are attacks. However, with the exception of Scott&#039;s original post, they are all in response to Rachel&#039;s seemingly odd rant against ethical concerns being raised. Again, my point is that merely raising ethical concerns is not an attack, referring back to her rant.

I&#039;m sorry if I made it seem that I was claiming that younger attorneys are more often sanctioned than older ones. I did not intend to convey that. I was merely speaking from my own and Rachel&#039;s perspective; as younger attorneys (in my case, almost-attorneys), even if there are many more older attorneys sanctioned than younger, the large number of young attorneys sancitoned should give us pause anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll start with your point about the tone of the posts: Yes, they are attacks. However, with the exception of Scott’s original post, they are all in response to Rachel’s seemingly odd rant against ethical concerns being raised. Again, my point is that merely raising ethical concerns is not an attack, referring back to her rant.</p>
<p>I’m sorry if I made it seem that I was claiming that younger attorneys are more often sanctioned than older ones. I did not intend to convey that. I was merely speaking from my own and Rachel’s perspective; as younger attorneys (in my case, almost-attorneys), even if there are many more older attorneys sanctioned than younger, the large number of young attorneys sancitoned should give us pause anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics, Ethics, Everywhere… by Lisa Solomon</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/679/ethics-ethics-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=679#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>You made a specific statement about young attorneys. While I&#039;m aware that, as you say, lots of attorneys have been sanctioned for violating professional responsibility rules, without additional analysis, your statement implying that young attorneys violate professional responsibility rules more often than experienced attorneys is unsupported.

I agree that being made aware of eth­i­cal con­cerns is not the same as being attacked. However, I&#039;ve read the posts you link to (and others). The tone is definitely one of attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made a specific statement about young attorneys. While I’m aware that, as you say, lots of attorneys have been sanctioned for violating professional responsibility rules, without additional analysis, your statement implying that young attorneys violate professional responsibility rules more often than experienced attorneys is unsupported.</p>
<p>I agree that being made aware of eth­i­cal con­cerns is not the same as being attacked. However, I’ve read the posts you link to (and others). The tone is definitely one of attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

