<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Point &#38; Glick &#187; blawrgument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pointandglick.com/tag/blawrgument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pointandglick.com</link>
	<description>Staggering blindly into the legal world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A nation founded on immorality</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandglick.com/140/a-nation-founded-on-immorality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pointandglick.com/140/a-nation-founded-on-immorality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mglickman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blawg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blawrgument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandglick.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pointandglick.com/140/a-nation-founded-on-immorality/" title="A nation founded on immorality"></a>I read with interest the blawrgument (I might need an intervention with all these pseudo-words) regarding whether breaking the law is, in itself, an immoral act. The discussion went from prosecutor to defender, across the country, and it covered most &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.pointandglick.com/140/a-nation-founded-on-immorality/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pointandglick.com/140/a-nation-founded-on-immorality/" title="A nation founded on immorality"></a><p>I read with interest the blawrgument (I might need an intervention with all these pseudo-words) regarding whether breaking the law is, in itself, an immoral act. The discussion went from <a href="http://crimlaw.blogspot.com/2009/01/morality-and-immorality-of-not-guilty.html">prosecutor </a>to <a href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/01/prosecutors-were-punishing-sinners.html">defender</a>, <a href="http://ecilcrime.com/2008/12/20/is-it-ethical-to-plea-not-guilty/">across </a><a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/01/05/the-two-most-loaded-words-in-a-courtroom.aspx#comment-1686907">the </a><a href="http://www.wacocriminallawblog.com/2009/01/articles/evidence-and-procedure/what-does-not-guilty-really-mean/">country</a>, and it covered most of the issues, specifically revolving around the morality of pleading not guilty when the defendant did commit a crime. </p>
<p>The point I found myself pondering is this: When the founding fathers rebelled against the English, breaking the laws of their parent nation, did that make them immoral? Are we, as Americans, a nation founded on immorality? If not, where lies the difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pointandglick.com/140/a-nation-founded-on-immorality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

